Home » Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 Lens Review

Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 Lens Review

Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8

The Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is an all-time classic and one of the best vintage lenses commonly available today.

Come learn why you should get one here.

This post contains affiliate links. If they are clicked and lead to a purchase I may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.

———

55mm isn’t the most common length for a camera lens.

That honour would probably go to the 50mm, and with good reason too.

They’re readily available, relatively cheap, and usually well-made.

They’re also a nice length for portrait photography whilst still being short enough for general street-style shooting.

So with just 5mm difference, a 55mm should be pretty much the same. Right?

Since buying it, I’ve found my Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 to be all of the above.

With plenty of them available on eBay, as you can see here, is it a lens you should be looking to buy too?

All will be revealed in this review as we explore:

  • the history of the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8
  • how old your Takumar is
  • using this classic lens on a digital camera
  • the image quality of this vintage glass
  • shooting street at 55mm
  • the radioactivity of the lens (seriously)
  • why I chose it over a 50mm f1.4
  • if you should or shouldn’t buy one

Let’s start at the beginning.

History of the Asahi / Pentax / Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8

Before I bought this vintage lens, the only Asahi I knew was the beer.

However, there was once a camera manufacturer in Japan known as the Asahi Optical Co.

It was founded by one Kumao Kajiwara who named the lenses produced after his brother, the painter Takuma Kajiwara.

In the years that followed, the Asahi Optical Co., Ltd. became what we now know, generally, as Pentax, which is now itself a subsidiary of Ricoh.

The first lot of Takumar 55mm f1.8 lenses date back to the late 1950s and were known simply as that: Takumar 55mm f1.8.

As newer versions were released and used on cameras like the Asahi Pentax Spotmatic, they were given prefixes like Auto, Super, Super-Multi-Coated, and SMC.

Production of the lenses ended in the mid 1970s.

super-takumar-55mm-f1-8

How old is my Takumar 55mm f1.8?

If you have a 55mm Takumar and want to know how old it is, you can figure it out by the name and by the product code found on the reverse of the auto/manual diaphragm switch, if there is one.

Mine is a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 with the product code 37101 which, as you can see from the table below, makes it from sometime between 1965 and 1971.

Name Product Code Aperture Produced
Takumar 55mm F1.8 f1.8 – f22 1958
Auto-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (early) f1.8 – f22 1958 – 1960
Auto-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (late) 345 f1.8 – f16 1960 – 1962
Super-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (early) 345-2, 345-5, 33450, 34520 f1.8 – f16 1962 – 1965
Super-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (late) 371, 37100, 37101 f1.8 – f16 1965 – 1971
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 55mm F1.8 37104, 37101,37106 f1.8 – f16 1971 – 1972
SMC Takumar 55mm F1.8 37104, 37101, 37106 f1.8 – f16 1972 – 1975

Using the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 on a digital camera

If you’re planning on using a 55mm Takumar on a digital camera, you’ll likely likely need an adapter.

What adapter that is depends on the type of camera you have. If you have an e-mount Sony like I do, you’ll need an m42-NEX adapter.

These are always available on Amazon and aren’t too expensive. You can check the price and availability for yourself right here.

The Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 itself is not that big, but any adapter you might need to marry it to your camera will of course increase the length of the set-up.

When put together, the lens and adapter together are actually a little longer than the (old) 18-55mm Sony NEX kit lens.

f-zuiko-38mm-sony-nex-kit-lens-super-takumar-55mm

In my review of the F.Zuiko 38mm f1.8, I talked about how the small size (of the adapter as much as the lens) was something I was very fond of.

So does the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 lose points for being so big?

Not for me.

I think most photographers slip very easily into ‘taking pictures’ mode.

When you’re out and about and just doing what you have to do to get the shots you want, without thinking too much about how, the size of the lens becomes immaterial.

My fingers are on the aperture ring, which is actually a nice distance from the camera thanks to the adapter, and the focus ring at the front of the lens.

The aperture ring turns very freely on my lens, with a healthy sounding click as it moves onto the next f value.

I say value, rather than stop, as it does allow you to use half-stops, aside from between f11 – f16.

The focus ring on my Super-Takumar is very smooth, and this classic lens just feels like it was well built in the first place and has been looked after ever since.

super takumar 55mm f1.8 lens

Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 image quality

The image quality of the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 has never been in question.

Indeed, many users of manual focus lenses rate it among the best vintage lenses commonly available; especially when the price is taken into consideration too.

Mine has spent as much time on my camera as any other lens I’ve owned, and I’ve taken some of my very favourite photos with it.

They’re plenty sharp enough when you nail the focus, and with good contrast and colours too.

Every image in the gallery below is a real world shot I’ve taken with the 55mm Super-Takumar.

The best place to find your own Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is eBay. You can easily do so by pasting Super Takumar 55mm f1.8 in the box below and hitting search.

Street photography with the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8

I bought this classic lens because I needed something around 50mm for a photography class I was taking at the time.

This was studio-based, and so the lens was really to be used for portraits and other shots taken in a controlled environment.

Before I bought it, 55mm was what I considered zoomed in.

It was the upper reach of my kit lens, and I only went there when it was really needed; it’s not like I walked around with my kit lens fully zoomed in all the time.

So how much use I’d get from this classic lens outside of the class workshops, I wasn’t sure. I thought at the time it would just be too long to do any kind of street shooting.

Again though, photography is all about trying new gear, challenging yourself with new limits, and making the best of the lens you have with you.

Once I’d gotten to grips with the focal length, I ended up really enjoying the street photography I did with it.

I think the 55mm focal length actually has an advantage for street photography beginners, in that you can keep a little distance from your subjects if you’re still nervous abut approaching them.

For example, I don’t think I would’ve got close enough to get the following shot with a wider lens on my camera.

lap of samui featured image

Shooting wide open with the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8

If you’re buying a prime lens that can to f1.8, you’ll probably want to play around with shooting it wide open at some point.

In other words, blurring background and isolating subjects.

Although most of my street photography is shot with most of the image in focus nowadays, the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is good for shallow depths of field too.

I wouldn’t recommend shooting a lens completely wide open, as it means you lose sharpness. This means not shooting at f1.8 itself, but staying somewhere around f2.8 instead.

This is still enough to blur your backgrounds and get the kind of results as shown below.

house number sign in shanghai china

discarded food container in xitang china

Is my Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 radioactive?

Yes.

Yes it is.

One thing that I was surprised to learn about the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 – after I’d bought it – was its radioactivity.

A yellowing of the glass is a sign of this.

Very briefly: the radioactivity comes from the use of such compounds as thorium oxide (me neither) in the construction of the lens.

I’m no expert, but you can find a lot of information about this in various places on the web.

With that in mind, should you be worried about this vintage lens affecting your health?

Personally, I’m not.

The information I’ve seen seems to suggest the radioactivity is minimal, and no more of a danger than the radioactivity encountered when flying or being x-rayed.

So no, I’m not overly concerned.

You might feel differently, and this issue might put you off buying a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8.

That’s up to you.

It never crosses my mind when I’m using it though.

hong kong taxi

Why buy a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8?

When I took a trip out to the huge Xing Guang Photographic Equipment Market in Shanghai in search of a 50mm lens, I didn’t have this lens in mind.

There was no way I could; I’d never actually heard of Super-Takumar.

Before finding it tucked away in the corner of a shop, away from the cabinet with most of the other vintage lenses for sale, I’d tried a few different manual focus 50mm lenses on my camera.

A couple of old Nikkors, a Konica, and a Yashica. Some of which were f1.4.

In truth, we’re actually a bit spoilt for choice when it comes to great value manual focus 50mm lenses, so the decision to buy the 55mm Super-Takumar lens was based primarily on test shots.

I put every vintage lens mentioned above on my Sony NEX and took a few shots with each.

They were all similarly priced. Or close enough for the price to not be a factor in my decision. So it all came down to picture quality.

And the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 won.

There was, though, one more thing I had to decide.

monochrome street photography reflection

Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 or Super-Takumar 50mm f1.4?

It’s a question often asked.

I think plenty of other people would have gone for the 50mm. It’s a slightly shorter length and also faster – f1.4 vs f1.8.

So why did I go for the 55mm f1.8?

The answer lies in the length.

On full frame cameras, the classic length for portrait lenses is 85mm.

With DX models, where the crop factor means the focal length of your lens is really x1.5 of what it says, the cheaper, common 50mms are pretty close to 85mm.

50 x 1.5 = 75.

Close enough to be negligible when the lens is so relatively cheap.

I was given the choice though, for just about the same price, to have a 55mm lens. When multiplied by 1.5, this gave me a focal length of 82.5mm.

Closer to the classic 85mm. As I was buying it primarily for classes in a studio, this seemed important.

If you want to learn more about focal length, check my article here. I did my best to explain it as simply as I could.

Perhaps the 50mm f1.4 might have been a better option for you.

It’s all based on what a person needs the lens for, and of course the test shots.

The 55mm was the right choice for me, and I have not regretted it since.

Buying a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8

Maybe I got lucky finding my Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 having no prior knowledge of what it was.

Maybe it was fate.

But when you choose a lens based on the quality of its test shots, you know you’re picking up something good.

You now have all this information and the luxury of taking your pick of all the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8s on ebay.

I love mine, and it’s not just me who thinks it’s one of the best vintage lenses commonly available.

The build quality matches the image quality.

Even with the adapter added, which you can easily find on Amazon, the lens is very affordable.

Put all this together and I can see why the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is thought of as one of the best vintage lenses still used by photographers today.

I’d recommend you track one down for yourself too.  😀

Remember, the best place to find your own Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is eBay. You can easily do so by pasting Super Takumar 55mm f1.8 in the box below and hitting search.

All sample images taken with Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8

———————————–

Found this Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 lens review useful? Have one yourself? Let me know in the comments below or hit me up on Twitter!

And if you think others will find this review useful too, why not share or pin?

The Super Takumar 55mm f1.8 is an all-time classic and one of the best vintage lenses commonly available today. Come learn why you should get one here.

There are 12 comments Join the conversation

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *