The Minolta MC W.Rokkor-HG 35mm f2.8 generally brings the build quality you’d expect from the legendary name, but what about the results it gives? Even with the lenses being common and inexpensive, is it worth you picking one up?
Come find out in this comprehensive review.
The most common and affordable focal lengths in prime lenses are 35mm and 50mm.
So was it worth the wait?
Let’s find out in this review as we explore the following:
History of the Minolta Rokkor MC 35mm f2.8
Like those of many other camera companies, Minolta lenses were given a different or extra name to the bodies they were used on.
Think Konica Hexanon or Pentax Super Takumar.
For Minolta, this was Rokkor, which was used from 1940 to 1980 (and briefly between 1996 and 1998). It was inspired by the Rokko mountain that could be seen from the company’s factory in Mukogawa near Osaka, Japan.
The first Minolta 35mm f2.8 lens was the W.Rokkor-HG, which dates from 1958.
However, this was a low-production model that was quickly superseded the following year by the Auto W.Rokkor-HG. A compact version of this was also later released, in 1965.
In 1966, Minolta updated its 35mm f2.8 lens to the MC W.Rokkor-HG, which ran in its original form until 1973 when it too was upgraded to a new design, although the name remained the same.
This is the version that I have and that you can get for yourself from eBay here.
A smaller and lighter version of this lens, known as the MC W.Rokkor, appeared in 1975.
In 1977, as Minolta changed from its MC lenses to MD, the 35mm f2.8 again changed to the MD W.Rokkor, with a lighter version being introduced a year later.
Note that this rundown of Minolta Rokkor 35mm f2.8 lenses doesn’t include f1.8 versions, the Shift lens from 1976, or anything from after 1980 when the Rokkor name was dropped.
How old is my Minolta Rokkor 35mm f2.8?
If you have a Rokkor 35mm f2.8 and want to know how old it is but find the information above confusing, the table below will help.
It includes information parsed from that previous paragraph alongside some extra details.
You can check the name, filter diameter, and maximum aperture of yours to narrow down when it was made.
I know that mine, being an MC W.Rokkor-HG with a metal focus ring and unpainted aperture ring, was made sometime between 1966 to 1973.
|Name||Filter Diameter||Max Aperture||What Changed||Made From|
|Auto W.Rokkor-HG||55mm||f22||Became 'Auto'||1959|
|Auto W.Rokkor-HG||52mm||f16||Diameter and aperture||1965|
|MC W.Rokkor-HG||52mm||f16||Became 'MC'||1966|
|MC W.Rokkor-HG||55mm||f16||Rubber focus ring||1973|
|MC W.Rokkor||55mm||f16||No longer 'HG'||1975|
|MD W.Rokkor||55mm||f22||Became 'MD'||1977|
|MD W.Rokkor||49mm||f22||49mm diameter||1978|
What do the letters mean on my Minolta Rokkor?
You may be wondering what the letters mean on the different versions of these Minolta 35mm lenses – and on all other Rokkor lenses too, for that matter.
The W in W.Rokkor means wide-angle. So far so simple.
MC means meter coupled, from the metering system found on the cameras they shipped with.
MD means minimum diaphragm, which is again from the newer metering system found on the later Minolta cameras.
If you’re buying a vintage Rokkor to use on a digital camera today, both of these are immaterial.
The letters seen after Rokkor pre-1975 – mostly HG in the case of the 35mm lenses – relate to their optical formula, with the first letter denoting the number of lens groups and the second the number of lens elements.
The first letter is seemingly taken from Greek and / or Latin numerical prefixes (tri, quatro, penta, hexa, septi, octo, novem) while the second is the basic, modern-day Roman alphabetical equivalent.
From this we can see the 35mm Minolta lenses with the HG suffix had 7 lens elements (G) in 6 lens groups (H).
Some further examples, for clarity: a 28mm Rokkor SG had 7 lens elements in 7 lens groups while a 50mm Rokkor PG had 7 lens elements in 5 lens groups.
Finally, you may find you have an X on your lens; Rokkor-X HG, or simply just Rokkor X.
All this X means is the lens was produced for the American market. The lens itself is the same, with or without this extra marking.
So with the full name of my version being Minolta MC W.Rokkor-HG 35mm f2.8, I can tell it’s from an earlier meter coupled camera, is a wide-angle lens, has 7 lens elements in 6 lens groups, and was not made for the American market.
Build and image quality of the Minolta 35mm
I feel like I say this on every vintage lens review I write but the build quality of the MC Rokkor 35mm is reassuringly solid.
If a lens is to last for over 50 years like mine has, it does need to be put together well, and that does appear to be the case when you pick up this block of metal and glass.
However, there is one common issue that crops up with the inner workings of Minolta MC Rokkor lenses.
Unfortunately, the aperture blades are prone to becoming oily, which can slow down their responsiveness to open and close.
This is true of mine, although I didn’t even notice it happening until I read about it while researching for this review and checked.
That means it’s never gotten in the way of me actually using the lens. And when I do use it, the results are generally great.
I don’t know exactly why, but I’ve found myself mainly shooting my street photography with it at f11. Most other lenses I’m at f8.
It just seems to be a sweet spot for sharpness with this Minolta 35mm and helps me get more of my attempted shots actually in focus.
As with every vintage lens review I do, there are no zoomed-in flower-at-every-aperture test shots here.
Just real world photographs I’ve taken with it – mainly for the #leesixtyfive project.
Using vintage Minolta lenses on digital cameras
To use Minolta Rokkor lenses on your digital camera, you’ll probably need an adapter.
What adapter that is depends on your camera but it will start with MD.
Because I use a Sony mirrorless camera, I need an MD-NEX adapter (which you can find on Amazon here).
Don’t worry about whether your Rokkor lens is MC or MD, by the way.
The company thoughtfully used the same mount – commonly spoken of as the Minolta MD mount but actually called the SR mount – throughout all of its cameras, so one MD adapter is all you need for any and all Minolta Rokkor lenses you may have.
Using them on a digital camera like this means having no electrical communication between lens and body, which means changing the aperture and focus manually, on the lens.
For me, that’s a big part of what makes shooting vintage lenses so fun and satisfying.
Street photography with the Minolta Rokkor 35mm
Having shot street photography with vintage lenses from 28mm up to 55mm, I think I’ve settled on my favourite length being somewhere in the middle.
Until now that’s been the F.Zuiko 38mm f1.8, but this Minolta 35mm is very similar.
It does mean having to get closer to your subjects than when using a 50mm or 55mm, but that’s not really a problem for me. Most people in China don’t care if you include them in your photographs.
The plus side of shooting street photography with a wider lens is being able to add more background to your shots.
I’ve been enjoying composing the whole shot recently, rather than focusing solely on the people in the middle of it.
Should you buy a Minolta MC W.Rokkor-HG 35mm f2.8?
I’ve never had a problem recommending any of the vintage lenses I’ve reviewed before, but there is something holding me back from telling you to just go get yourself a Minolta MC W.Rokkor-HG 35mm f2.8.
That thing is the aforementioned oily blades, which appear to be a potential issue on many vintage Minolta lenses and not just the 35mm.
I do wonder if buying a newer MD version of the lens will help you avoid this issue, but even then the only way to be sure is to check the actual lens for yourself.
I’ve seen eBay listings for used Minolta lenses that reduce the price when the blades are oily, which is refreshingly honest and nice to see. And if you do end up with one that suffers from this problem, you can get them cleaned up anyway.
Whether this issue is enough to put you off buying a Minolta Rokkor is up to you, but as there are plenty of other 35mm vintage lenses out there to choose from, I can see how you might want to leave the Rokkors alone.
From my personal experience, even having a slight lag on the aperture closing up hasn’t affected the output I get from this lens, and it’s output that I’ve been very happy with so far.
So, to buy or not to buy?
All I can really say is… I’m very happy with mine.
All sample images taken with the Minolta MC W.Rokkor-HG 35mm f2.8
Found this Minolta MC W.Rokkor-HG 35mm f2.8 lens review useful? Have one yourself? Let me know in the comments below or hit me up on Twitter!
And if you think others will find this review useful too, why not share or pin?