The Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is an all-time classic and one of the best vintage lenses commonly available today. Come learn if you should get one here.
55mm isn’t the most common length for a camera lens.
That honour would probably go to the 50mm, and with good reason too. They’re readily available, relatively cheap, and usually well-made.
They’re also a nice length for portrait photography whilst still being short enough for general street-style shooting. With just 5mm difference, a 55mm lens should be pretty much the same. Shouldn’t it?
Since buying it, I’ve found my Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 to be all of the above. With plenty of them available on eBay, as you can see here, is it a lens you should be looking to buy too?
All will be revealed in this review as we explore the following:
History of the Asahi / Pentax / Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8
Before I bought this vintage lens, the only Asahi I knew was the beer.
However, there was once a camera manufacturer in Japan known as the Asahi Optical Co. It was founded by one Kumao Kajiwara who named the lenses produced after his brother, the painter Takuma Kajiwara.
In the years that followed, the Asahi Optical Co., Ltd. became what we now know, generally, as Pentax, which is now itself a subsidiary of Ricoh.
The first lot of Takumar 55mm f1.8 lenses date back to the late 1950s and were known simply as that: Takumar 55mm f1.8.
As newer versions were released and used on cameras like the Asahi Pentax Spotmatic, they were given prefixes like Auto, Super, Super-Multi-Coated, and SMC.
Production of the lenses ended in the mid-1970s.
How old is my Takumar 55mm f1.8?
If you have a 55mm Takumar and want to know how old it is, you can figure it out by the name and by the product code found on the reverse of the auto/manual diaphragm switch, if there is one.
Mine is a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 with the product code 37101 which, as you can see from the table below, makes it from sometime between 1965 and 1971.
|Takumar 55mm F1.8||-||f1.8 - f22||1958|
|Auto-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (early)||-||f1.8 - f22||1958 – 1960|
|Auto-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (late)||345||f1.8 - f16||1960 – 1962|
|Super-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (early)||345-2, 345-5, 33450, 34520||f1.8 - f16||1962 – 1965|
|Super-Takumar 55mm F1.8 (late)||371, 37100, 37101||f1.8 - f16||1965 – 1971|
|Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 55mm F1.8||37104, 37101,37106||f1.8 - f16||1971 – 1972|
|SMC Takumar 55mm F1.8||37104, 37101, 37106||f1.8 - f16||1972 – 1975|
Using the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 on a digital camera
Using most, if not all, vintage lenses on digital cameras will mean shooting in some sort of non-fully auto mode and with manual focus. If you’re not used to either, don’t worry. They’re not hard to learn.
For the former, I recommend aperture priority mode. You can read about how I use that here.
Many new and new-ish digital cameras come with some sort of manual focus aid too. On the Sony mirrorless I use, focus peaking has been an unbelievable help to me. Other manufacturers have their own systems too, which you will know about if you own one of their cameras or can research if you’re in the market.
The bottom line though is this: if you’ve never shot a vintage lens before, don’t let having to get out of full-auto put you off. You can learn aperture priority and manual focus without too much trouble.
Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 size and handling
The Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 itself is not that big, but the adapter you’ll probably need to use to marry it to your camera (more on that later) will increase the length of the set-up.
When put together, the lens and adapter I use are actually a little longer than the (old) 18-55mm Sony NEX kit lens, as you can see below.
In my review of the F.Zuiko 38mm f1.8, I talked about how the small size (of the adapter as much as the lens) was something I was very fond of. So does the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 lose points for being bigger?
Not for me. I think most photographers slip very easily into ‘taking pictures’ mode.
When you’re out and about and just doing what you have to do to get the shots you want without thinking too much about how, the size of the lens becomes immaterial.
My fingers are on the aperture ring, which is actually a nice distance from the camera thanks to the adapter, and the focus ring at the front of the lens.
The aperture ring turns very freely on my lens, with a healthy sounding click as it moves onto the next f value. I say value, rather than stop, as it does allow you to use half-stops, aside from between f11 – f16.
The focus ring on my Super-Takumar is very smooth, and this classic lens just feels like it was well built in the first place and has been looked after ever since.
The adapter needed for your Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8
If you’re planning on using a 55mm Takumar on a digital camera, you’ll likely need an adapter.
What adapter that is depends on the type of camera you have. I use a Sony mirrorless and find it a great partner for all the vintage lenses I have; especially with the aforementioned focus peaking feature. If you need a camera for your digital lenses, I recommend you check out the Alpha range on Amazon.
If you do have a Sony mirrorless camera, the adapter you’ll need for your Super-Takumar 55mm is an m42-NEX, which you can easily find on Amazon.
If you have a camera with any other type of mount, you should still be able to find an adapter for it, although you may struggle if it’s a Nikon f-mount.
The adapter you need will always begin with m42, though, as that’s what the mount on the lens is, and you can either find it in the table below or go search for yourself here if you don’t see it there.
Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 image quality
The image quality of the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 has never been in question.
Indeed, many users of manual focus lenses rate it among the best vintage lenses commonly available; especially when the price is taken into consideration too.
Mine has spent as much time on my camera as any other lens I’ve owned, and I’ve taken some of my very favourite photos with it.
They’re plenty sharp enough when you nail the focus, and with good contrast and colours too.
Every image below is a real-world shot I’ve taken with the 55mm Super-Takumar.
Street photography with the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8
I bought this classic lens because I needed something around 50mm for a photography class I was taking at the time.
This was studio-based, and so the lens was really to be used for portraits and other shots taken in a controlled environment.
Before I bought it, 55mm was what I considered zoomed in. It was the upper reach of my kit lens, and I only went there when it was really needed; it’s not like I walked around with my kit lens fully zoomed in all the time.
So how much use I’d get from this classic lens outside of the class workshops, I wasn’t sure. I thought at the time it would just be too long to do any kind of street shooting.
Again though, photography is all about trying new gear, challenging yourself with new limits, and making the best of the lens you have with you.
Once I’d gotten to grips with the focal length, I ended up really enjoying the street photography I did with it.
I think the 55mm focal length actually has an advantage for street photography beginners, in that you can keep a little distance from your subjects if you’re still nervous about approaching them.
For example, I don’t think I would’ve got close enough to get the following shot with a wider lens on my camera.
Shooting wide open with the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8
If you’re buying a prime lens that can to f1.8, you’ll probably want to play around with shooting it wide open at some point.
In other words, blurring backgrounds and isolating subjects.
Although most of my street photography is shot with most of the image in focus nowadays, the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is good for shallow depths of field too.
I wouldn’t recommend shooting a lens completely wide open, as it means you lose sharpness. This means not shooting at f1.8 itself, but staying somewhere around f2.8 instead.
This is still enough to blur your backgrounds and get the kind of results as shown below.
Is my Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 radioactive?
Yes. Yes it is.
One thing that I was surprised to learn about the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 – after I’d bought it – was its radioactivity. A yellowing of the glass is a sign of this.
Very briefly: the radioactivity comes from the use of such compounds as thorium oxide (me neither) in the construction of the lens.
I’m no expert, but you can find a lot of information about this in various places on the web. With that in mind, should you be worried about this vintage lens affecting your health?
Personally, I’m not. The information I’ve seen seems to suggest the radioactivity is minimal, and no more of a danger than the radioactivity encountered when flying or being x-rayed.
So no, I’m not overly concerned. Maybe I should be, but I’m not.
You might feel differently, and this issue might put you off buying a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8. That’s up to you. It never crosses my mind when I’m using it though.
Why buy a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8?
When I took a trip out to the huge Xing Guang Photographic Equipment Market in Shanghai in search of a 50mm lens, I didn’t have this lens in mind.
There was no way I could; I’d never actually heard of Super-Takumar.
Before finding it tucked away in the corner of a shop, away from the cabinet with most of the other vintage lenses for sale, I’d tried a few different manual focus 50mm lenses on my camera.
A couple of old Nikkors, a Konica, and a Yashica. Some of which were f1.4.
In truth, we’re actually a bit spoilt for choice when it comes to great value manual focus 50mm lenses, so the decision to buy the 55mm Super-Takumar lens was based primarily on test shots.
I put every vintage lens mentioned above on my mirrorless Sony camera and took a few shots with each. They were all similarly priced. Or close enough for the price to not be a factor in my decision.
So it all came down to picture quality and the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 won. There was, though, one more thing I had to decide.
Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 or Super-Takumar 50mm f1.4?
It’s a question often asked.
I think plenty of other people would have gone for the 50mm. It’s a slightly shorter length and also faster – f1.4 vs f1.8. So why did I go for the 55mm f1.8?
The answer lies in the length.
On full frame cameras, the classic length for portrait lenses is 85mm. With DX models, where the crop factor means the focal length of your lens is really x1.5 of what it says, the cheaper, common 50mms are pretty close to 85mm.
50 x 1.5 = 75.
Close enough to be negligible when the lens is so relatively cheap.
I was given the choice though, for just about the same price, to have a 55mm lens. When multiplied by 1.5, this gave me a focal length of 82.5mm.
Closer to the classic 85mm. As I was buying it primarily for classes in a studio, this seemed important. If you want to learn more about focal length, check my article here. I did my best to explain it as simply as I could.
Perhaps the 50mm f1.4 might have been a better option for you. It’s all based on what a person needs the lens for, and of course the test shots.
The 55mm was the right choice for me, and I have not regretted it since.
Buying a Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8
Maybe I got lucky finding my Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 having no prior knowledge of what it was. Maybe it was fate. But when you choose a lens based on the quality of its test shots, you know you’re picking up something good.
You now have all this information and the luxury of taking your pick of all the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8s on eBay.
I love mine, and it’s not just me who thinks it’s one of the best vintage lenses commonly available. The build quality matches the image quality and the lens is very affordable, even with the adapter – which you can easily find on Amazon – added in.
Put all this together with a wonderful Sony mirrorless camera – again available on Amazon – and I can see why the Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 is thought of as one of the best vintage lenses still used by photographers today.
I’d recommend you track one down for yourself too. 😀
All sample images taken with Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8
Found this Super-Takumar 55mm f1.8 lens review useful? Have one yourself? Let me know in the comments below or hit me up on Twitter!
And if you think others will find this review useful too, why not share or pin?